It will come as no surprise to anyone that this event previously posted about and scheduled for next week has been cancelled, for all the obvious reasons.
I hope that you're all staying safe and well out there. These are unsetlling times; but they have been for quite a long while.
I just wanted to add a couple of thoughts whilst I am here:
This virus is frequently being described as an enemy. We are at war with it. This language
has been used by members of the UK government as well as French and
American ones. This is patently ridiculous and insulting. What we
have is an enormous crisis in public health. There's been the “wars”
on terror/drugs etc. for a very long time now; though, oddly, what
happened to Iraq or Afghanistan in the earlier part of this century
(still ongoing) was never declared, nor the obvious war on Libya more recently. Prosecuting a war on
another human regime or nation is at least logically coherent. But nonetheless, it has to be a “war” on Covid, despite the fact that it has no uniforms, flags or
territory beyond the individual human body, wherever that body might
happen to be. It has to be this way because, in accordance with
the emotional blackmail of the so-called “blitz spirit” in the
UK, the total mobilisation of civil society, commercial interests and
government in order to promote individual survival and the public good can only be
understood via the metaphor of war. Peacetime is defined by
individualism and endemic competition; solidarity is rare, or even
regarded as unhelpful to economic growth or the nation “punching
above its weight” in trade and other such banalities.
Because our
society is emphatically not predicated on mutual
support and solidarity, protecting the vulnerable and promoting the
public good in its “normal” operations, the extraordinary
condition must be invoked: that of war with its connotations of
existential struggle, sacrifice for the greater good etc.
It seems that the
proof that this "enemy" is defeated would simply be getting back to screwing over the
vulnerable and each other in a collective-yet-individualised frenzy
of business-as-usual? That's something to exercise the
virtues of public spirit and self-sacrifice for?
If this
current situation is an unprecedented threat to our collective and
individual well-being what can be said about what preceded it, the
normal background against which this now stands in such
supposedly stark contrast that it must be described as a "war"? That this virus is a serious
threat to our collective life I do not for a moment deny. It is. I just want to point out that what passed for “collective life” prior to the
outbreak - taken as a whole - was also a serious threat to our
collective life.
No comments:
Post a Comment